Romney in Newt out
Who is voting for this guy anyways! Really
Texas Gov. Rick Perry will end his bid for the Republican presidential nomination today and is expected to endorse former House speaker Newt Gingrich, according to two sources familiar with his thinking.
Gingrich himself said via email this morning that all he knows is “not much. Rumors.”
Perry has called a press conference at 11 a.m. today in North Charleston to announce the news, which was first reported by CNN’s Peter Hamby.
Republican presidential candidate and Texas Governor Rick Perry speaks during the Personhood USA presidential forum in Greenville, South Carolina January 18, 2012. REUTERS/Chris Keane
Perry’s announcement comes just hours before the candidates will gather for their 16th debate of the Republican race and just two days before the South Carolina primary.
For the last several months, it had become clear that Perry would not be a major factor in the race — hamstrung by a string of lackluster debate performances that culminated in his inability to name the three federal agencies that he would eliminate if elected president.
One early Perry fundraiser, who soured on the campaign as the candidate repeatedly stumbled, said the decision “was a foregone conclusion to what has been quite possibly the worst-run presidential campaign of our lifetimes.”
Following a fifth-place finish in Iowa, Perry said that he would return to Texas to reassess his candidacy. But, less than 24 hours later he announced — via Twitter! — that he would continue in the race.
Perry effectively skipped the New Hampshire primary on Jan. 10, where he took a meager 1 percent of the vote, to focus his time and money on South Carolina.
But polling released over the last several days made clear that Perry was gaining no traction in the Palmetto State. In an NBC/Marist survey of South Carolinians released this morning, he took just 4 percent.
View Photo Gallery: The Texas governor is dropping out of the 2012 GOP presidential race.
Gingrich, on the other hand, is gaining momentum in the Palmetto State following a strong showing in a debate on Monday night. Gingrich and Perry have known each other for quite some time; the former Speaker wrote the introduction to Perry’s book, “Fed Up!”
In October, Gingrich told the Post’s Karen Tumulty that when Perry got in the race, he had told wife and staff: “If Rick can hit major-league pitching, he’s the nominee. We won’t be able to stop him.”
But he was later “stunned,” he said, by Perry’s ineptitude at the debates. “I was surprised by the inability to adjust and modify and shift.”
Given Perry’s lack of traction in South Carolina, it’s tough to see his exit having a major effect on the dynamics of the state’s primary.
Perry was seen as pulling from the same pool of voters as Gingrich and former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum — the conservative alternatives to Romney — and his exit could help Gingrich in particular if he can steer his donors and supporters in the former House speaker’s direction.
But Romney’s campaign suggested it won’t matter much.
“Perry didn’t have many votes, and they will scatter across the ballot,” said a senior Romney adviser granted anonymity to speak candidly about the race. “It doesn’t change the essential dynamic of the race, which is about finding someone who can lead on jobs and defeat Obama in the fall. On both those counts, Mitt Romney is head and shoulders above the field.”
Staff writers Karen Tumulty, Dan Eggen, Philip Rucker and Aaron Blake contributed to this report.
Read more on PostPolitics.com
Santorum edged Romney in Iowa vote
What’s Marianne Gingirich got on her ex?
Gingrich sees a South Carolina surge
Santorum’s erroneous marriage attack on Obama
The Obama administration rejected the application of a Canadian firm TransCanada to build the Keystone XL pipeline. The issue has become a national political story, sparking rebukes from both left and right of Obama’s handling of the issue. As Juliet Eilperin and Steven Mufson reported:
President Obama, declaring that he would not bow to congressional pressure, announced Wednesday that he was rejecting a Canadian firm’s application for a permit to build and operate the Keystone XL pipeline, a massive project that would have stretched from Canada’s oil sands to refineries in Texas.
The controversial Keystone XL pipeline has been under review for more than three years. Environmental groups have argued that the extraction of oil sands contributed to climate changes and the pipeline itself posed leak risks. Supporters of the pipeline say that it will create jobs and enhance energy security. Here’s a look at some of the key players in the pipeline plan and the protests against it.
House Speaker John Boehner says President Barack Obama is breaking his promise to create jobs by rejecting a plan to build an oil pipeline from Canada to Texas. (Jan. 18)
Obama said that a Feb. 21 deadline set by Congress as part of the two-month payroll tax cut extension had made it impossible to do an adequate review of the pipeline project proposed by TransCanada.
“This announcement is not a judgment on the merits of the pipeline, but the arbitrary nature of a deadline that prevented the State Department from gathering the information necessary to approve the project and protect the American people,” the president said in a statement.
The decision and the language that accompanied it made clear that the White House, far from deflecting a political issue until after the election, was fully engaged in a battle with pipeline proponents. Obama said that his administration had worked to improve energy security through higher fuel-efficiency standards, and that it would explore ways to relieve the pipeline bottleneck slowing oil shipments between a major terminal in Cushing, Okla., and the nation’s gulf coast refineries.
The administration will allow TransCanada to reapply for a permit after it develops an alternate route around the sensitive habitat of Nebraska’s Sandhills. The administration’s decision includes language making it clear that TransCanada can reapply, stating, “The determination does not preclude any subsequent permit application or applications for subsequent projects.”
Industry officials and analysts said they expect TransCanada to submit a new route proposal for the Nebraska leg of the pipeline within two weeks. TransCanada declined to comment on the matter Wednesday.
So what is next for the Keystone XL pipeline after their initial failure? As Ezra Klein wrote:
As my colleagues Juliet Eilperin and Steven Mufson report, the Obama administration is all set to officially nix the Keystone XL pipeline, which would’ve carried oil from Canada’s tar sands down to the Gulf Coast. So why did Obama reject it? And what happens next?
White House officials have blamed Republicans in Congress for imposing an arbitrary deadline on the project that made a proper review of the pipeline all but impossible. Back in November, President Obama said that the Keystone pipeline needed to be rerouted in response to concerns that leaks could taint Nebraska’s water supplies. That process would’ve stretched into 2013, past the election. And so, in last month’s payroll tax cut extension, Republicans included a provision that forced the administration to make a final decision on the pipeline by Feb. 21 of this year. White House officials bristled at what spokesman Jay Carney called “an attempt to short-circuit the review process.” And, in the end, the administration decided to block the project outright.
Millions of Americans oppose SOPA and PIPA because these bills would censor the Internet and slow economic growth in the U.S.
Two bills before Congress, known as the Protect IP Act (PIPA) in the Senate and the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the House, would censor the Web and impose harmful regulations on American business. Millions of Internet users and entrepreneurs already oppose SOPA and PIPA.
The Senate will begin voting on January 24th. Please let them know how you feel. Sign this petition urging Congress to vote NO on PIPA and SOPA before it is too late.